Default pamac behavior suggests to cancel an update procedure. Pamac is not safe enough? To use safer pacman only?

Pamac Version

10.2.2-5

Libpamac Version

11.1.1-1

Desktop environment

KDE

What's "not working"

An update procedure suggested to be canceled. It has unexpected barrier for changing the default value. Default value should not be against already selected targeted action by user.

How to reproduce?

pamac update

Example:

$ pamac update
Preparing...
Synchronizing package databases...
Refreshing extra.db...                                                                                                                                                                       
Refreshing chaotic-aur.db...                                                                                                                                                                 
Resolving dependencies...                                                                                                                                                                    
Checking inter-conflicts...

To upgrade (1):
  libpamac  11.1.2-1  (11.1.1-1)  extra  854.4 kB

Total download size: 854.4 kB
Total installed size: 40 bytes

Apply transaction ? [y/N]

I can't just hit Enter after review of updates, I always should change default suggestion for selected target action of update of sort of do not update to update.

If I want to update and typed it pamac update, why you introduce a barrier to me? It is usually unsafe action for pamac? So pacman with its barrier absence of [Y/n] should be used instead of pamac? Why not to make useful behavior? pamac is not safe enough / so unstable to make updates and that's why trying to cancel the user direct command?

Or pamac users estimated to have lower IQ than pacman users?