From a5c9161f27c3e1ae6c0094d262f03a7e98262181 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:49:23 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86, atomic64: In selftest, distinguish x86-64 from 586+ The x86-64 implementation of the atomics is totally different from the i586+ implementation, which makes it quite confusing to call it "586+". Also fix indentation, and add "i" for "i386" and "i586" as used elsewhere in the kernel. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Luca Barbieri <luca@luca-barbieri.com> LKML-Reference: <1267005265-27958-4-git-send-email-luca@luca-barbieri.com> --- lib/atomic64_test.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/atomic64_test.c b/lib/atomic64_test.c index f7bb706c9c3af..65e482caf5e9e 100644 --- a/lib/atomic64_test.c +++ b/lib/atomic64_test.c @@ -144,14 +144,16 @@ static __init int test_atomic64(void) BUG_ON(v.counter != r); #ifdef CONFIG_X86 - printk(KERN_INFO "atomic64 test passed for %s+ platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n", -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64 - "586", + printk(KERN_INFO "atomic64 test passed for %s platform %s CX8 and %s SSE\n", +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + "x86-64", +#elif defined(CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64) + "i586+", #else - "386", + "i386+", #endif - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without", - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without"); + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8) ? "with" : "without", + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM) ? "with" : "without"); #else printk(KERN_INFO "atomic64 test passed\n"); #endif -- GitLab