From ca7f686ac9fe87a9175696a8744e095ab9749c49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:36:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix silly typo in comment I was passing through and figuered I'd fix this up: featuer -> feature Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index 1717ba1db35dd..9079715794af6 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0; /* * CPU feature detected at boot time based on system-wide value of a * feature. It is safe for a late CPU to have this feature even though - * the system hasn't enabled it, although the featuer will not be used + * the system hasn't enabled it, although the feature will not be used * by Linux in this case. If the system has enabled this feature already, * then every late CPU must have it. */ -- GitLab